A rigorous study published by the American Heart Association was deleted by the group following pressure from media outlets and government officials online. Shortly before the study was deleted, Twitter applied warning labels to any account that shared the link.
The study found that the current MRNA vaccines “dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
According to the study the experts used a PULS cardiac test which is a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers, that generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).
“The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients… These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post the second dose of vaccine. We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
The study was published in early November but it wasn’t until early December that the study received attention online. Following the publication of several articles on the study from mostly conservative media outlets, and after pressure from journalists on social media platforms, the AHA deleted the study from their website.
Twitter also applied a warning label to any tweet that included the link.
After the outcry, the AHA updated the link with the following notice:
“Soon after the publication of the above abstract in Circulation, it was brought to the American Heart Association Committee on Scientific Sessions Program’s attention that there are potential errors in the abstract. Specifically, there are several typographical errors, there is no data in the abstract regarding myocardial T-cell infiltration, there are no statistical analyses for significance provided, and the author is not clear that only anecdotal data was used. We are publishing this Expression of Concern until a suitable correction is published to indicate that the abstract in its current version may not be reliable.”
According to another study that has not been retracted — which was published in MedRxiv — the current COVID vaccines are statistically more dangerous to children than COVID-19 itself.
“In lieu of pediatric vaccination mandates, the US may: 1) consider gathering data on the previous infection in this age group and/or 2) follow the example of Germany, Sweden, Norway, and the WHO and hold off on definitively recommending the vaccination of low-risk children against C19”
The rate of hospitalization for children aged 5-17 stands at approximately 6 per 100,000 for COVID-19, whereas the estimated rate of hospitalization for influenza is much higher in the same age group.
Furthermore, a team of Johns Hopkins researchers recently reported that after studying a large sample size of children, they found zero COVID deaths among healthy kids.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced recently that a review of mRNA-type vaccines had revealed an increase in the risk of myocarditis in younger males, mentioning in particular Pfizer–BioNTech’s shot and the one developed by Moderna. It comes the agency commissioned a review of data related to heart inflammation disorders in individuals vaccinated with Moderna’s vaccine.
In early November, Germany’s vaccine advisory committee recommended the use of Pfizer-BioNTech’s Comirnaty shot over Moderna’s Spikevax, citing similar concerns. A number of Nordic nations have also restricted the use of Moderna’s vaccine. To date, Pfizer has been the only vaccine that has been immune from various pauses, despite news stories citing countless cases of clotting from Pfizer’s jab.
According to a recent report by the Daily Mail, research regarding the AstraZeneca vaccine uncovered what they believe to be triggering at least the blood clots being reported for that specific vaccine.
The study published in Science Advances concluded that, essentially, their vaccine acts like a magnet and attracts platelets which the body mistakes for a threat and attacks.
“After being delivered into the body adenovirus binds with a specific protein in the blood, known as platelet factor 4 (PF4), which is normally used by the body to promote coagulation in case of injury… The body’s immune system considers this platelet cluster as threat and releases antibodies to attack it, clumping together to it and triggering potentially life-threatening blood clots. This condition is called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT).”
Another study published in the MDPI or Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute found that,
“Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) may occur after COVID-19 vaccination. VITT can present as cerebral sinus and venous thrombosis (CSVT), often complicated by intracranial hemorrhage. Today it is unclear, how long symptomatic VITT can persist.”
One news outlet documented at least 69 cases of athletes collapsing or dying following vaccination with the COVID vaccines within the span of one month.
“Many top athletes from both Europe and the US have reported serious side effects after a Covid jab. For French professional tennis player Jérémy Chardy, it has meant the end of his career. Chardy, formerly ranked 73 in the world, said he has been unable to train and play. Since I got my vaccine, I have a problem, I have had a series of problems. As a result, I can’t train, I can’t play, Cahrdy said.”
Unfortunately, some of these incidents in young athletes led to death. In Montana, Jedd Hoffman, a Park City High School football player passed away just a few days following his collapse on the field during practice.
According to an investigation published by The BMJ, researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several research facilities contracted by Pfizer say that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, and was slow to follow up on adverse events.
According to Altmetric, the investigation was the most viewed article published in any science journal for 2021.
In June, viral immunologist, Dr. Byram Bridle and a group of international scientists filed a request for information on the accumulation concern from a regulatory agency, and received access to what’s called the “biodistribution study.”
According to the data, the spike proteins from the mRNA vaccines could accumulate in the body – especially in regions of high concentration of ACE2 receptors – like the testicles and ovaries.
Researchers say that If the immune system attacks the location where these proteins accumulate, then an auto-immune condition, among other serious conditions is highly likely.