A scientific research article published recently in the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association proposes a cure for ‘Whiteness’ which the researcher calls “a malignant, parasitic-like condition.”
The paper, titled On Having Whiteness, was written by Dr. Donald Moss, a Jewish man who is a faculty member of both the New York Psychoanalytic Institute and the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis.
“My grandmother reminded me of my obligation as a Jew. She said I was twice indebted: to her for the blood she had once given me and to Abraham for everything else. She said these debts must be honored. Until they are honored, she said, dying was not within my rights. She said, “You are our only revenge. You are our Hitler. Promises have been made. The dead are watching and must not be disappointed. She said the machine will work forever. In America, every part can be replaced. Every vital fluid can be found, everything kept clean. What has been done once can be done again. What has been achieved can be repeated. She said, “You will die only by an act of will. As long as you are alive Hitler has lost.”
And on the following page, he writes:
“On the machine, the body is purified of its biological dimension. I wanted my mind a sphere. I wanted the elimination of quality. I wanted to throw a dog against a garage door. I wanted to become the machine.”
Moss has lectured on the subject of ‘Whiteness’ before the paper was published in the bi-monthly, peer-reviewed Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. In 2019, he also described ‘Whiteness’ as a parasitic condition during an address for the Psychoanalytical Association. Prior to this, he also lectured on the same subject at the New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute in New York.
In his paper written on May 27th 2021, Moss proposed a cure for ‘Whiteness.’
“Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation.”
In the latest paper, Moss also writes that “‘White’ people have a particular susceptibility” to the “parasitic” condition, which he claims “renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse.”
It is particularly interesting that Moss uses the word ‘insatiable’ here. Recently, a blog post from 2007 written by Kamau Bobb – the head of diversity at Google – was discovered. In the blog post, Bobb claimed that Jews have an ‘insatiable appetite for war.
Bobb made the comments in a Nov. 30, 2007, post about the Israel-Palestine conflict, titled “If I Were a Jew” while he was a research associate in technology at Georgia Tech, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
“If I were a Jew today, my sensibilities would be tormented. I would find it increasingly difficult to reconcile the long cycles of oppression that Jewish people have endured and the insatiable appetite for vengeful violence that Israel, my homeland, has now acquired,” he wrote.
After dozens of left-wing and right-wing Jewish organizations discovered Bobb’s blog post, – including the Simon Wisenthal Center which occasionally funds seminars on Whiteness – they demanded that he be fired for antisemitism.
A few days later, a spokesperson for Google told news outlets that Mr. Bobb would “no longer be part of our diversity team going forward”.
“We unequivocally condemn the past writings by a member of our diversity team that are causing deep offense and pain to members of our Jewish community,” they said.
Rhetoric That Goes Unpunished, and Often Encouraged
ViacomCBS recently restored its working relationship with Nick Cannon less than one year after the media conglomerate terminated Cannon following a controversial podcast episode.
Cannon was not fired for basically saying that White people are subhuman and closer to animals because their lack of melanin, he was fired specific ally for what he said about Jewish people. His rhetoric against White people on the other hand is encouraged across media and academia, and you can not easily find exactly what he said about White people with a simple internet seach.
Viacom, which is owned by Jewish American billionaire Sumner Redstone, fired Cannon for his ‘antisemitic’ remarks.
No one in the media came to Cannon’s defense in regards to what he said about Jews, but many defended his statements about White people.
Many journalists quickly took to Twitter to post their articles describing Cannon’s statements about White people as ‘speaking out against racism.’ This was an almost identical reaction we observed from the media regarding similar statements about White people made by L’oreal model Munroe Bergdorf.
It is difficult to return exact search results for what Cannon said about White people, but it is even more difficult to locate the exact statements made by Bergdorf.
“Once white people begin to admit that their race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on Earth, then we can talk,” was just one of the many statements made by the transgender L’oreal model.
After the death of George Floyd, CNN reported that ‘L’Oreal dropped the model for commenting on systemic racism.’ In June, L’oreal rehired Bergdorf using Floyd’s death as a pretext.
Marc Lamont Hill has also said many negative things about White people on CNN, but the international news conglomerate didn’t fire him for his Anti-White remarks, he was terminated after ‘controversial comments’ he made about Israel.
Who is really in charge here? Who really has the power?
Under the State Department’s formal definition of ‘antisemitism,’ it lists ‘accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group’ as a bullet point of what it means to be ‘antisemitic.’
Why aren’t White people afforded this same immunity?